---
title: "ChatGPT Ignores Your Company? Fix It in 9 Steps"
description: "ChatGPT not recommending your product? From 50+ SaaS campaigns, here are the 9 steps that actually fix it — in the right order, with realistic timelines."
lang: en
json-ld: |
  [
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@graph": [
        {
          "@type": "Article",
          "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company#article",
          "headline": "ChatGPT Ignores Your Company? Here's How to Fix It in 9 Steps",
          "description": "ChatGPT not recommending your product? From 50+ SaaS campaigns, here are the 9 steps that actually fix it — in the right order, with realistic timelines.",
          "image": {
            "@type": "ImageObject",
            "url": "/images/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company-featured.webp"
          },
          "datePublished": "2026-03-09",
          "dateModified": "2026-03-09",
          "author": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/#/schema/person/yuval-halevi"
          },
          "publisher": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/#organization"
          },
          "isPartOf": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/#website"
          },
          "mainEntityOfPage": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company#webpage"
          },
          "articleSection": "AI Visibility"
        },
        {
          "@type": "WebPage",
          "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company#webpage",
          "url": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company",
          "name": "ChatGPT Ignores Your Company? Here's How to Fix It in 9 Steps | Growtika",
          "description": "ChatGPT not recommending your product? From 50+ SaaS campaigns, here are the 9 steps that actually fix it — in the right order, with realistic timelines.",
          "isPartOf": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/#website"
          },
          "breadcrumb": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company#breadcrumb"
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
          "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company#breadcrumb",
          "itemListElement": [
            {
              "@type": "ListItem",
              "position": 1,
              "name": "Home",
              "item": "https://growtika.com"
            },
            {
              "@type": "ListItem",
              "position": 2,
              "name": "Blog",
              "item": "https://growtika.com/blog"
            },
            {
              "@type": "ListItem",
              "position": 3,
              "name": "ChatGPT Ignores Your Company? Here's How to Fix It in 9 Steps",
              "item": "https://growtika.com/blog/chatgpt-ignoring-company"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "@type": "Person",
          "@id": "https://growtika.com/#/schema/person/yuval-halevi",
          "name": "Yuval Halevi",
          "jobTitle": "Co-Founder at Growtika",
          "url": "https://growtika.com/about",
          "sameAs": [
            "https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuvalhalevi/"
          ],
          "worksFor": {
            "@id": "https://growtika.com/#organization"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "FAQPage",
      "mainEntity": [
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Why does ChatGPT ignore my company?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "ChatGPT learns from training data. If your company wasn't mentioned enough in authoritative sources before the training cutoff, it doesn't exist from the model's perspective. Confidence comes from consistent independent mentions across sources it already trusts."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "How long does it take to appear in ChatGPT?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Depends on the platform: Perplexity 2-4 weeks, Google AI Overviews 4-8 weeks, Claude 60-120 days, ChatGPT 60-180 days."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Can I contact OpenAI to get my company added?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "No. OpenAI doesn't accept individual company correction requests. The only path is building the authority signals the model absorbs when it next updates its training data."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Does updating my website help?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Partially. Website structure helps Perplexity and Google AI Overviews because they retrieve live. For ChatGPT and Claude, the work happens off your site."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "My competitor shows up everywhere. How do I close the gap?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "First, diagnose the gap precisely. The answer usually reveals whether the gap is editorial coverage, Trust Hub presence, track record, or entity consistency."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "What is entity consistency and why does it matter?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Entity consistency means your company name, category, description, and key claims match across every platform. When the model sees conflicting descriptions, it can't form a confident picture."
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
---

[![Growtika](/images/logo.webp)](/)

[LET'S TALK](/contact)

[Home](/)

Solutions

Use Cases

Sectors

Resources

[LET'S TALK](/contact)

1.  [Home ](/) 
2.  [Blog ](/blog) 
3.  Chatgpt Ignoring Company  

AI Visibility 

# ChatGPT Ignores Your Company? Here's How to Fix It in 9 Steps 

Most fixes people try don't work because they start at step 4. The sequence is what matters. Here's what the data from 50+ campaigns shows.

By Yuval Halevi  |  Growtika  |  March 2026  |  12 min read

You ask ChatGPT for the best tools in your category. Three competitors come up. Your product doesn't. You've been in the market for years. You have customers. You have a real product. And yet the model acts like you don't exist.

I've seen this with companies in cybersecurity, developer tools, fintech, HR tech. Across all of them the pattern is the same: the companies that appear in ChatGPT didn't optimize for ChatGPT specifically. They accumulated the kind of third-party presence that the model absorbs during training and interprets as legitimacy. The fix is working backwards from that.

These 9 steps are in the order that works. Skipping to step 5 without completing step 2 is why most of these efforts stall.

TL;DR

-   **ChatGPT won't cite you if it isn't confident about you.** Confidence comes from consistent third-party mentions, not your website.
-   **The sequence matters:** authority building before content optimization. Most companies get this backwards.
-   **Timeline:** Perplexity in 2-4 weeks. ChatGPT and Claude in 60-180 days. Start all of them now.
-   **The fastest single lever:** getting into independent comparison articles on Trust Hub platforms in your niche.
-   **GEO rarely drives referral clicks.** It drives pre-formed perception. Buyers arrive already knowing your name.

## Why ChatGPT Ignores You

ChatGPT works in two ways. Most of what it knows comes from training data. Everything it absorbed before its cutoff date. But it also has a browsing mode that can pull live content from the web. Both matter.

If you weren't mentioned enough in authoritative sources before training, you don't exist in the model's world. And if you block its crawlers, browsing mode can't find you either. In both cases, the result is the same: the model isn't confident about you, so it doesn't recommend you.

If you only exist on your own site, you don't exist in the model's world. If you exist in a few places with inconsistent descriptions, the model can't form a reliable picture of what you do. It hedges. It defaults to the competitor it has seen more often, from more trusted sources, with a cleaner category association.

This is an entity authority problem, not a content problem. The fix requires building authority first, then optimizing how that authority is read. Learn more about how this works in our [analysis of why competitors get cited and you don't](/blog/competitors-cited-ai).

Signal

Your Company

Your Competitor

Third-party presence

Website only

Consistent across 8 platforms

Category naming

4 different names across platforms

Same category name everywhere

Reviews & coverage

G2 empty or 3 reviews

45 PeerSpot reviews, editorial coverage

Comparison mentions

No editorial coverage

Cited in 6 comparison articles

AI Confidence

Low — not cited 

High — cited every time 

First, figure out where exactly you stand. The diagnosis changes which steps matter most right now.

Diagnose Your Situation

Select what ChatGPT is doing with your company

Never mentioned

Mentioned incorrectly

Competitors appear, I don't

Appears sometimes, not always

Appears but paraphrased

←

Select your situation to see the root cause

## The 9 Steps

01

### Run a Proper Baseline Before Touching Anything

Low effort 1-2 hours Foundation 

Most companies skip this and spend months optimizing for the wrong thing. Run 30 queries before making any changes. You need to know: does the model know you exist, what does it say when it mentions you, which competitors appear in queries where you don't, and which platforms does it cite when it answers questions in your category.

Five prompts that give you a complete picture in 30 minutes:

Prompt 1 — Brand recognition

What do you know about \[Your Product\]? What category does it belong to and what is it primarily used for? What sources inform your knowledge?

Copy

Prompt 2 — Best-of citation test

What are the best \[your category\] tools for \[your target buyer\]? List the top 5 with a one-line description of each.

Copy

Prompt 3 — Comparison context

Compare \[Your Product\] vs \[Top Competitor\]. Who is each best suited for? What are the main differences?

Copy

Prompt 4 — Category definition

What is \[your category\]? What are the leading solutions in this space and what differentiates each?

Copy

Prompt 5 — Authority gauge

On a scale of 1-10, how well-known is \[Your Product\] in the \[your category\] market? What would it take for them to be more widely recognized?

Copy

Log the results. Do this in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. The gaps between platforms tell you where to invest. Run the same 30 queries every two weeks from this point forward so you can measure movement. For a deeper framework on this, see our [guide on how ChatGPT rates your brand authority](/blog/how-chatgpt-rates-your-brand-authority).

Log This Now

The domains ChatGPT cites when answering questions in your category. That domain list is your Trust Hub. Every step that follows is about closing presence gaps on that specific list.

02

### Unblock AI Crawlers in 10 Minutes

Low effort 10-30 min Unblocks everything else 

Check your robots.txt now. In our audits, roughly one in three companies has at least one major AI crawler blocked — often without knowing it. Some have all of them blocked. Cloudflare's "Bot Fight Mode" blocks AI crawlers at the network layer even when your robots.txt is correct.

Every crawler you need to explicitly allow:

```
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /
```

OAI-SearchBot

This is OpenAI's crawler for ChatGPT's browsing mode — separate from GPTBot which handles training. Most older robots.txt templates don't include it. A blocked OAI-SearchBot means ChatGPT's live browsing can never find you.

Also Check

Cloudflare dashboard under Security settings. Bot Fight Mode and Super Bot Fight Mode both block AI crawlers regardless of robots.txt.

03

### Write One Canonical Definition and Deploy It Everywhere

Low effort 1 day High impact 

LLMs build their picture of what you do by aggregating signals from every source they've seen. If your G2 profile calls you a "workflow automation platform," your LinkedIn says "AI-powered business tools," and your website says "the operating system for modern teams," the model can't form a confident picture of what you actually are.

Canonical Definition Formula

\[Product\]  is a \[specific category\]  for \[ICP\]  that \[primary function\] . Unlike \[well-known alternative\] , it \[differentiator with a measurable claim\] .

Specific category means one thing. Not "comprehensive," not "all-in-one," not "next-generation." The definition should be nearly identical across every platform.

Platform

Where to update

Time

Website

Homepage meta description, About page, footer tagline

30 min

LinkedIn

Company page tagline and About section

10 min

G2

Profile description and category tags

15 min

PeerSpot

Company overview (claim profile first if needed)

20 min

Crunchbase

Short description and long description

15 min

Press release boilerplate

Boilerplate paragraph at end of every future PR

10 min

The All-In-One Trap

Products positioned as "all-in-one"  give the model no clear answer to "when should I recommend this?"  Own one specific category first. Expand the positioning once you're established.

04

### Find and Close Your Trust Hub Gaps

Medium effort 2-4 weeks Highest impact 

A Trust Hub is the cluster of platforms LLMs pull from when answering questions in your category. It's not universal. From a 150-query study across cybersecurity, fintech, dev tools, and general SaaS, the top citation sources are completely different by niche.

\*From Growtika's 150-query study, March 2026 — citation frequency across best-of, comparison, and definition query types\*

Niche

Top citation sources

Most underused

Cybersecurity

Dark Reading, Bleeping Computer, PeerSpot, Reddit (r/netsec)

PeerSpot — outperforms G2 but rarely prioritized

Developer Tools

dev.to, Stack Overflow, Hacker News, GitHub

GitHub discussions — cited more than most expect

Fintech

Forbes Advisor, Investopedia, Wikipedia, Reddit

Investopedia — high authority for fintech definitions

General B2B SaaS

Wikipedia, PeerSpot, TechRadar, Reddit

PeerSpot — cited 3x more than G2 in best-of queries

All niches

Wikipedia

Definition queries — Wikipedia dominated 27 of 50

PeerSpot appears consistently across every B2B niche we've tracked. It outperforms G2 in citation volume in most categories. It requires genuine customer reviews — 5 detailed reviews from real customers with real outcomes.

This Week

Identify the 3 Trust Hub platforms where your competitors appear that you don't. Those are your priority gaps. Close them before worrying about content structure or schema markup.

Not sure where your Trust Hub gaps are?

We'll run the 150-query audit for your category and show you exactly which platforms to prioritize — and which competitors are already there.

[Book a Call →](/contact)

05

### Get Into Independent Comparison Articles

Medium effort 3-6 weeks Highest ROI per action 

Think about how trust works between people. If you tell someone you're the best at something, they're skeptical. If someone else tells them — someone with no stake in the outcome — they believe it. LLMs work the same way. One editorial placement in a niche publication carries more citation weight than dozens of posts on your own domain.

This is the mechanic behind the [70/30 rule](/blog/how-to-get-saas-mentioned-chatgpt): 70% of your brand mentions should come from independent third-party sources, 30% from self-published.

Three ways to get into comparison articles:

-   Find published articles comparing your competitors, email the author directly, explain why your product belongs
-   Reach out to niche publications and offer a "how to choose a \[category\]"  piece
-   Publish a "\[Your Product\] vs \[Competitor\]"  page on your own domain with genuine, balanced analysis

What the Model Reads as Manufactured

Identical phrasing across 15 sources published in the same week. Natural consensus means varied wording, built over months. One independent editorial mention with its own language outweighs ten identical republications.

06

### Echo a Topic Across Every Content Layer You Own

Medium effort 3-6 weeks per topic Builds category authority 

LLMs assign authority by topic, not by company. The way to trigger that: go narrow and echo the same topic across multiple layers of content you control.

Pick one specific niche, use case, industry, or problem your product solves. Then build the full stack around it:

1

Money page

Solution page, use case page, product page, or industry page targeting the niche. This is built to convert. It carries your canonical definition for this specific use case, specific outcome claims, and FAQ schema sourced from buyers in this niche.

↓

2

Core blog article

The definitive guide to the topic. Not a product pitch — a genuine reference piece that earns links and citations. This is what gets picked up by comparison articles and niche publications. It amplifies the money page's topical authority.

↓

3

Niche supporting articles

2-4 more specific pieces that go deeper on sub-problems within the topic. These are the long-tail. They increase the signal density around the topic and push you toward the edges where LLMs are more likely to treat you as the authority rather than one of many.

↓

4

Community presence

Reddit threads, Hacker News discussions, Stack Overflow answers, or niche forum posts around the same topic. Not marketing. Genuine participation using the same language and framing as your content layer.

For a practical example of this strategy in action, see our [Reddit marketing playbook for AI visibility](/blog/reddit-ai-visibility) — one of the most effective community layers.

Go Narrower Than Feels Comfortable

"SIEM"  is a category with 40 vendors. "SIEM for small security teams without a dedicated analyst"  is a topic where consistent coverage puts you in a position the model can fill with confidence. Long-tail topic dominance compounds. One niche at a time.

The Content Has to Actually Echo

The layers need to reinforce each other linguistically. Same category name, same ICP language, same core claim — not identical phrasing, but consistent framing.

How to Pick Your First Topic

Look at your sales conversations. The use case that comes up most in closed deals, the industry that converts fastest. That's your first echo topic.

07

### Restructure Your Key Pages for Extraction

Medium effort 1-2 weeks Preserves your differentiators 

LLMs extract structured content. They paraphrase prose. "Reduces MTTR by 40%" becomes "helps teams respond faster." Your exact benchmark — the thing that makes you different — disappears.

The rule that matters most: bullets under 15 words get extracted directly. Over 15 words and the model paraphrases.

Format

What happens

Fix

Bullets over 15 words

Paraphrased — your specific claim becomes generic

Cut to under 15 words. Remove qualifiers.

Vague claims ("significantly reduces")

Disappears or becomes meaningless filler

Replace with a number: "reduces by 40%"

Long prose description

Compressed into a generic category summary

Replace with the canonical definition (step 3)

Data in prose

Paraphrased or dropped

Put in a table — numbers in cells extract verbatim

No FAQ schema

Q&As on page are ignored as citation candidates

Add FAQPage schema markup

Prioritize your homepage, main product page, and any page targeting your primary category keyword. For a comprehensive list of content formatting tactics, see the [15 content strategies that rank in search and get cited by AI](/blog/content-strategies-ai-age).

08

### Build Your LLM Sitemap and llms.txt

Medium effort 2-3 days Single source of truth for AI 

An LLM Sitemap at `/llm-sitemap` is a single page that tells AI systems exactly what your company is, what category you're in, what you're not, and who you're for. Read our [LLM Sitemap guide](/blog/llm-sitemap) for a full walkthrough.

A `/llms.txt` file at your root is the plain-text equivalent. What each should include:

-   Your canonical definition (from step 3)
-   Your specific category and target buyer
-   Your 3-5 primary use cases with one-sentence descriptions
-   What you're not (reduces misclassification)
-   Key differentiators with specific metrics
-   FAQs sourced from your actual sales conversations
-   Links to your most authoritative third-party citations

Source Your FAQs From Sales

The questions buyers actually ask your sales team are the same questions they're asking ChatGPT. Ask your sales team for their top 10 objections and pre-sale questions. Those become your FAQ block.

09

### Add FAQ Schema to High-Intent Pages

Low effort 2-4 hours Each answer is a citation candidate 

Every FAQPage schema markup you add turns each Q&A pair into a discrete citation candidate. The model can pull a single answer without quoting the whole page.

```
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [{
    "@type": "Question",
    "name": "What is [Your Product] used for?",
    "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "[Your Product] is a [category] for [ICP]. It [primary function]. Unlike [alternative], it [differentiator with specific metric]."
    }
  }]
}
```

Also add `dateModified` schema to every page you update. Retrieval systems treat recency as a reliability proxy. For a complete checklist of schema and structural optimizations, see the [51-Point AI Visibility Checklist](/blog/seo-ai-search-checklist).

Source from sales calls, not keyword tools

The questions that convert in ChatGPT are the same questions buyers ask before they're ready to buy. "Does \[Product\] work with \[Integration\]?"  "How long does \[Product\] take to implement?"  These come from your sales team, not from keyword research.

YH

Expert Tip

Stop over-optimizing. Launch the thing.

With the rise of LLMs, people have started running AI audits on their websites constantly. Ask Claude to audit your site and it will always find something. The question is: **will fixing this actually move citations?**

The real standard is simple. Your site needs to be clean, load fast, speak your brand clearly, and have high-quality content. Beyond that, for AI visibility specifically:

-   AI crawlers can access it
-   Your canonical definition is consistent everywhere
-   Key pages have structured content — bullets under 15 words, specific numbers, FAQ schema
-   You have an LLM Sitemap and llms.txt

That's the list. Everything beyond it is diminishing returns. The companies that get cited fastest close those fundamentals and then spend their energy on Trust Hub presence — not endlessly re-auditing their schema.

YH

Expert Tip

Don't fear content cannibalization. LLMs handle it differently than Google.

For years, content cannibalization was one of the things we obsessed over in SEO. When you target very similar keywords across multiple pages, Google gets confused about which one to rank.

LLMs work differently. They are quite good at understanding the intent behind a query and matching it to the most relevant piece of content — even when you have multiple pages covering closely related topics. This changes the calculus on the echo strategy from step 6.

**The practical upside:** you can go narrow and specific without worrying that one page will cannibalize another. Google might struggle to choose between them. ChatGPT will surface whichever is more relevant to the specific query.

## Timeline Expectations by Platform

The sequence above applies to all platforms, but the timelines differ significantly. Perplexity retrieves in real time — steps 2, 6, and 7 show results in weeks. ChatGPT updates its training data periodically, so steps 3, 4, and 5 take months to surface.

Platform

Mechanism

Which steps help most

Timeline

Perplexity

Live retrieval

Steps 2, 6, 7 — structure and crawlability

2-4 weeks

Google AI Overviews

Search index + retrieval

Steps 6, 7, 8 — schema and structure

4-8 weeks

Claude

Training data

Steps 3, 4, 5 — authority and entity clarity

60-120 days

ChatGPT

Training data + web browse

Steps 3, 4, 5 — entity authority and consensus

60-180 days

Set realistic expectations internally before you start. The bi-weekly query tracking from step 1 is what gives you the data to show progress at the pace each platform allows.

Start This Week

Run the 5 baseline prompts in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. Check your robots.txt for OAI-SearchBot. Write your canonical definition. These three actions take under two hours and unblock everything that follows.

The companies that get cited in ChatGPT at the 6-month mark started their authority work on day one. The clock starts when you start, not when you decide GEO matters.

Want us to run this playbook for you?

We've done this for 50+ SaaS companies across cybersecurity, developer tools, fintech, and HR tech. Let's diagnose your situation and build the 90-day plan.

[Book a Free Audit →](/contact)

## FAQs

Why does ChatGPT ignore my company?+ 

How long does it take to appear in ChatGPT?+ 

Can I contact OpenAI to get my company added?+ 

Does updating my website help?+ 

My competitor shows up everywhere. How do I close the gap?+ 

What is entity consistency and why does it matter?+ 

![Yuval Halevi](/images/yuval-halevi.webp)

#### [Yuval Halevi](https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuvalhalevi/)

Helping SaaS companies and developer tools get cited in AI answers since before it was called "GEO." 10+ years in B2B SEO, 50+ cybersecurity and SaaS tools clients.

### Related Articles

[GEO Guide 

#### How To Get Your SaaS Product Mentioned in ChatGPT

The authority-first framework we use to get clients cited by AI.

](/blog/how-to-get-saas-mentioned-chatgpt)[AI Visibility 

#### ChatGPT SEO: 10 Best Practices to Get Cited by ChatGPT

Field-tested practices for appearing in ChatGPT answers.

](/blog/chatgpt-seo-best-practices)[AI Visibility 

#### Why Your Competitors Are Getting Cited in AI Answers (And You're Not)

When someone asks ChatGPT for the best tools in your industry, your competitors show up. You don't.

](/blog/competitors-cited-ai)

#### Company

-   [About Us](/about)
-   [Blog](/blog)
-   [GEO HubNew ](/geo-hub)
-   [Contact](/contact)
-   [Free ToolsNew ](/tools)
-   [Robots.txt Checker](/tools/robots-txt-checker)
-   [Robots.txt Generator](/tools/robots-txt-generator)

#### Solutions & Use Cases

-   [GEO Marketing](/services/geo-marketing)
-   [AI Search SEO](/services/ai-search-seo)
-   [ChatGPT SEO](/services/chatgpt-seo)
-   [Perplexity SEO](/services/perplexity-seo)
-   [SaaS Not on ChatGPT](/use-cases/saas-not-on-chatgpt)
-   [Competitors Cited](/use-cases/competitors-ai-citations)
-   [AI Visibility Audit](/use-cases/ai-visibility-audit)
-   [Entity Optimization](/use-cases/entity-optimization)

#### Sectors

-   [Tech](/sectors/tech)
-   [Cybersecurity](/sectors/cybersecurity)
-   [Fintech](/sectors/fintech)
-   [AI](/sectors/ai)

#### Top Content

-   [New Guide ChatGPT Search Optimization Guide ](/guides/chatgpt-search-optimization-guide)
-   [All Guides](/guides)
-   [Black Hat 2026 Field Guide](/black-hat-2026)
-   [LLM Visibility Guide](/blog/llm-visibility)
-   [SEO After LLMs](/blog/seo-after-llms)
-   [ChatGPT Recommends Competitors](/geo-hub/chatgpt-recommends-competitor)
-   [Breaking SEO Best Practices](/blog/breaking-seo-best-practices)

#### Earn a Link the Hard Way

A game in a footer? Bold move.

#### Top 3 · Fight for the Link

#

Company

Score

🥇

![Octo favicon](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=octo-sound.com&sz=64)[Octo](https://octo-sound.com "https://octo-sound.com")

43171

🥈

![Celesties favicon](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=celesties.org&sz=64)[Celesties](https://celesties.org "https://celesties.org")

3783

🥉

![vibeberry.io favicon](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=vibeberry.io&sz=64)[vibeberry.io](https://vibeberry.io "https://vibeberry.io")

2990

Only the top 3 get a link from Growtika. Fight for it.

[Beat the Leaderboard →](/game)

Outrun the top 3 and claim a do-follow link from Growtika.

[![Growtika](/images/logo-white.webp)](/)

SEO & AI Search Agency for B2B SaaS. Built for how buyers actually find you.

★ Top Product Marketing Clutch 

© 2026 Growtika.com | [LLM Sitemap](/llm-sitemap)

[](https://linkedin.com/company/growtika)[Privacy Policy](/privacy-policy)[Terms of Service](/terms)