--- title: "AI Search for Cybersecurity Vendors: Visibility Playbook" description: "Why AI ignores your security vendor when prospects ask ChatGPT. Entity architecture, LLM Sitemap, technical implementation, and a 90-day visibility fix." lang: en json-ld: | { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Article", "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity#article", "headline": "AI Search for Cybersecurity Companies: The Complete Visibility Playbook", "description": "Why AI ignores your security vendor when prospects ask ChatGPT for recommendations. Entity architecture, LLM Sitemap, technical implementation, and the 90-day fix.", "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://growtika.com/images/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity-featured.webp" }, "datePublished": "2026-01-18T00:00:00+00:00", "dateModified": "2026-01-18T00:00:00+00:00", "author": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/#/schema/person/yuval-halevi" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/#organization" }, "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/#website" }, "mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity#webpage" }, "articleSection": "Cybersecurity AI Visibility" }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity#webpage", "url": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity", "name": "AI Search for Cybersecurity Companies: The Complete Visibility Playbook | Growtika", "description": "Why AI ignores your security vendor when prospects ask ChatGPT for recommendations. Entity architecture, LLM Sitemap, technical implementation, and the 90-day fix.", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/#website" }, "breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity#breadcrumb" } }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://growtika.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Blog", "item": "https://growtika.com/blog" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "AI Search for Cybersecurity Companies: The Complete Visibility Playbook", "item": "https://growtika.com/blog/ai-search-cybersecurity" } ] }, { "@type": "Person", "@id": "https://growtika.com/#/schema/person/yuval-halevi", "name": "Yuval Halevi", "jobTitle": "Co-Founder at Growtika", "url": "https://growtika.com/about", "sameAs": [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuvalhalevi/" ], "worksFor": { "@id": "https://growtika.com/#organization" } } ] } --- [![Growtika](/images/logo.webp)](/) [LET'S TALK](/contact) [Home](/) Solutions Use Cases Sectors Resources [LET'S TALK](/contact) 1. [Home ](/) 2. [Blog ](/blog) 3. Ai Search Cybersecurity Cybersecurity AI Visibility # AI Search for Cybersecurity Companies: The Complete Visibility Playbook When prospects ask ChatGPT for SIEM recommendations, your competitor appears. You don't. Here's the technical fix. By Yuval Halevi | January 2026 | 25 min read From my experience working with 50+ cybersecurity vendors: the companies with the best products are often the most invisible to AI. This follows the same patterns we see in our [LLM visibility research](/blog/llm-visibility). Your threat research is excellent. Your detection rates are industry-leading. You have SOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP. And when someone asks ChatGPT "What's the best XDR for mid-market companies?" you're nowhere in the response. Your competitor with a worse product shows up first. This isn't random. It's a structural problem with how security vendors communicate with AI systems. Understanding [how SEO is changing after LLMs](/blog/seo-after-llms) is essential context here. ### TL;DR - **Entity consistency is foundation.** AI can't recommend you if it's confused about who you are. - **Disambiguation engineering.** Tell AI what you are NOT to prevent miscategorization. - **LLM Sitemap + llms.txt.** Technical files that tell AI exactly what you do. - **Second-order citations.** Get covered by publications AI already cites (Dark Reading, CSO Online). - **Threat reports as citation bait.** Numbered findings get quoted verbatim. - **Changelog as freshness signal.** Active updates prove you're not legacy tech. - **Perplexity in weeks, ChatGPT in months.** Different platforms, different timelines. ## Jump to Section [ 01 Why AI Ignores You The visibility gap explained ](#chapter-1)[ 02 Entity Architecture Building AI recognition ](#chapter-2)[ 03 Technical Stack LLM Sitemap, llms.txt, Schema ](#chapter-3)[ 04 Content Architecture What AI actually cites ](#chapter-4)[ 05 Advanced Tactics Expert-level strategies ](#chapter-5)[ 06 Authority Building Second-order citations ](#chapter-6)[ 07 90-Day Execution Week-by-week roadmap ](#chapter-7) ## Why AI Ignores Your Security Company Let's start with what actually happens when a prospect asks ChatGPT for security tool recommendations. How AI Decides What to Recommend AI weights entities by recognition strength and external validation. Better product doesn't mean better visibility. Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge AI systems don't evaluate products. They evaluate entities. And entity recognition comes from: - **Consistency.** Is your company name identical everywhere? Website, LinkedIn, G2, Crunchbase, press mentions? - **Corroboration.** Do multiple independent sources confirm what you claim? - **Context.** Can AI connect your brand to specific use cases and categories? Most security vendors fail on all three. Their LinkedIn says "Acme Security" but their website says "Acme, Inc." Their G2 profile lists different features than their homepage. The only place that calls them "HIPAA compliant" is their own trust page. We explore this pattern in depth in our [AI SEO tools guide](/blog/ai-seo-tools-geo). The Hard Truth Your competitor isn't winning AI citations because they have a better product. They're winning because AI trusts what it knows about them more than what it knows about you. ### Test Your Current Position Run these five queries in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Document exactly what appears. #### AI Visibility Audit Copy each prompt, run in ChatGPT and Perplexity, document results What are the best \[your category\] tools for mid-market companies? Copy What compliance certifications does \[Your Company\] have? Copy Compare \[Your Company\] vs \[Top Competitor\] for \[specific use case\] Copy What \[your category\] is best for companies with \[your ICP constraint\]? Copy Who founded \[Your Company\] and what does the company do? Copy Score: 0-1 mentions = Critical | 2-3 = Moderate | 4-5 = Strong ## Entity Architecture: Building AI Recognition Entity consistency is the foundation everything else builds on. If AI is confused about who you are, nothing else works. Entity Consistency Audit: What to Check Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge ### The Disambiguation Problem Security vendors create category confusion constantly. "We're an XDR, but we also do SIEM, and we have EDR capabilities, and our platform includes SOAR workflows..." AI doesn't know what to do with this. When someone asks "best XDR for mid-market," AI looks for entities that are clearly XDR vendors. If your messaging is muddy, you lose. AI Gets Confused "We provide a unified security platform that combines XDR, SIEM, and SOAR capabilities with cloud-native architecture and AI-powered analytics for comprehensive threat detection and response." AI Gets It "Acme is an Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platform. We are NOT a SIEM (we integrate with SIEMs). We are NOT a managed service (we are a product)." Key Insight Disambiguation is as important as definition. Telling AI what you're NOT prevents miscategorization. This is especially critical in security, where category overlap is constant. ## The Technical Stack: llms.txt, LLM Sitemap, Schema Three technical implementations work together to make your entity clear to AI: The AI Visibility Technical Stack Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge ### llms.txt Template for Security Vendors Create this file at `yourcompany.com/llms.txt`. For more on how AI crawlers find and use these files, see our [51-point AI visibility checklist](/blog/seo-ai-search-checklist) and [15 best practices for B2B SaaS AI visibility](/blog/ai-visibility-b2b-saas-best-practices): llms.txt Copy ``` # [Your Company] - Security Platform Overview > AI-powered [category] for [target market] [Your Company] provides [one-sentence description]. We serve [specific customer segments] across [industries]. ## What We Are - Managed Detection and Response (MDR) platform - Cloud-native, SaaS delivery model - 24/7 SOC with human analysts ## What We Are NOT (Important Distinctions) - NOT a self-hosted SIEM (we are fully managed) - NOT agent-based (we are agentless) - NOT just software (we include human analysis) ## Compliance Certifications - SOC 2 Type II: Certified since [year], audited by [auditor] Recertified: December 2025 - HIPAA: BAA available, covers [specific capabilities] - FedRAMP: [Status - Authorized/In Process] ## Core Capabilities - [Capability 1]: [One sentence with metric] - [Capability 2]: [One sentence with metric] ## Documentation - Trust Center: /security - API Docs: /docs/api - Changelog: /changelog - MITRE Mapping: /mitre-coverage ``` ### The Changelog as Freshness Signal In cybersecurity, "old" implies "insecure" or "abandoned." AI models have a recency bias for technology queries. If your last major content update was 2023, AI lowers its confidence score, assuming you might be legacy tech. This ties into the broader [content strategies that actually work for AI citations](/blog/content-strategies-ai-age). Freshness Signal Tactic Maintain a public changelog or "What's New" feed at **/changelog** and include it in your sitemap.xml and llms.txt. Regular, dated updates signal to AI that the entity is "alive" and "active." When a user asks "What are modern/current solutions for X?", active changelogs serve as a timestamped heartbeat that pushes you ahead of competitors who haven't published since last year. ### LLM Sitemap Structure Unlike XML sitemaps (which just list URLs), an [LLM Sitemap](/blog/llm-sitemap) is an HTML page that gives AI context about your content structure. It combines human navigation with semantic information AI can extract. What Makes LLM Sitemap Different XML sitemaps tell crawlers "these pages exist." LLM Sitemaps tell AI "here's what these pages are about, how they relate to each other, and what questions they answer." For a cybersecurity vendor, this means organizing content by: Solutions (by role, by use case), Compliance (by regulation), Integrations (by platform), and Resources. Key sections for your LLM Sitemap: Section What to Include Why AI Needs It **Solutions by Role** CISO, SOC Analyst, Security Engineer pages Matches "best \[tool\] for \[role\]" queries **Compliance Hub** SOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP, GDPR sections Matches "\[regulation\] compliant \[tool\]" queries **Integration Directory** AWS, Azure, Splunk, ServiceNow pages Matches "\[tool\] that integrates with \[platform\]" **Use Cases** Threat detection, compliance automation, etc. Matches problem-focused queries **Section FAQs** 3-5 questions per section with answers Pre-answers queries directly on sitemap ### Schema Implementation Add this to your homepage and key pages: JSON-LD Schema Copy ``` { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "Your Company", "description": "[Exact same description as llms.txt]", "hasCredential": [ { "@type": "EducationalOccupationalCredential", "credentialCategory": "certification", "name": "SOC 2 Type II", "recognizedBy": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "AICPA" } } ] } ``` ## Content Architecture: What AI Actually Cites AI doesn't cite "comprehensive guides." It cites specific, quotable content that answers specific queries. Your content architecture needs to create citation opportunities. Content That Gets Cited vs Content That Gets Ignored Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge ### The Threat Report Citation Hack Most security vendors write threat reports. Few optimize them for AI citation. Here's what works: AI systems heavily cite specific data from original research. When your threat report says "we observed a 340% increase in credential stuffing attacks targeting healthcare organizations in Q3," that becomes quotable. Converting Threat Reports into AI-Citable Content Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge Threat Report Citation Tactic Create a dedicated "Key Findings" page for every threat report with numbered findings: **Finding 1:** We observed a 340% increase in credential stuffing attacks targeting healthcare organizations in Q3 2025. **Finding 2:** 67% of successful breaches exploited unpatched vulnerabilities older than 90 days. AI extracts these as authoritative data points. Your competitors write 40-page PDFs that AI can't parse. You write 500-word summary pages that AI quotes verbatim. ### Alt-Text Engineering for Architecture Diagrams Cybersecurity buyers trust architecture diagrams. Modern AI (GPT-4o, Gemini) is multimodal. It "looks" at your images. If your "How it Works" diagram is a flat PNG with alt text "architecture diagram," you are invisible. AI Sees Nothing architecture diagram RAG systems scrape text but ignore pixels. Your security architecture is completely invisible. AI Understands Everything Use SVGs with embedded text, or write 300-word "Caption-based Interpretations" immediately below: "Figure 1: Data flows from Collector (A) through Encryption Tunnel (B) to Cloud Analysis Engine (C). Customer data never leaves the premises..." ### The Vendor Security Questionnaire as Content Every security vendor completes hundreds of security questionnaires (VSQs) per year. Most treat this as a cost center. Smart vendors turn questionnaire answers into AI-ready content. Tactic Create a public FAQ page from your top 50 VSQ questions. Use FAQPage schema. Now when ChatGPT is asked "Does \[Company\] support SSO?", it has a structured answer to cite. ## Advanced Tactics for Security Vendors ### 1\. The "Competitor Comparison" Page Play When someone asks ChatGPT "Compare \[Your Company\] vs \[Competitor\]," what does it find? Most vendors don't own their comparison narrative. Create structured comparison pages with: - Feature-by-feature comparison tables - Use case fit ("Best for" statements) - Compliance coverage comparison - Integration compatibility matrix The vendor who creates the comparison page controls the narrative AI uses. ### 2\. The "Adjective Seeding" Strategy AI recommendations often use adjectives: "fastest," "most comprehensive," "best for small teams." Where do these adjectives come from? They come from external sources. Reviews, articles, forums. Tactic When requesting G2 reviews, frame the ask: "We'd love to hear about your experience, especially around speed of deployment and quality of support." Reviews that mention "fastest deployment I've seen" seed the adjective "fast" into AI's understanding of your brand. ### 3\. MITRE ATT&CK Mapping as Structured Data Security buyers increasingly ask AI questions tied to MITRE ATT&CK framework. "What tools detect T1059?" "Which XDR covers persistence techniques?" If your MITRE coverage is a PDF, AI can't cite it. Create HTML pages with structured tables: Technique ID Technique Name Detection Method T1059 Command-Line Interface Process monitoring with behavioral analysis T1566 Phishing ML-based email analysis with attachment sandboxing T1078 Valid Accounts UEBA detecting anomalous login patterns When someone asks ChatGPT "What tools detect T1059 command-line interface attacks?" your table becomes a citable source. ### 4\. The "Docs-to-Marketing" Injection Technical buyers (and AI agents acting for them) often search documentation to verify claims before visiting the marketing site. Most docs are dry and devoid of value propositions. Add "Micro-Positioning" to your top 10 most visited documentation pages: Standard Docs "To configure SSO, go to Settings..." Docs + Positioning "The SSO configuration allows large enterprises to enforce zero-trust access policies seamlessly. To configure..." ### 5\. The "What AI Gets Wrong" Content Play Search ChatGPT and Perplexity for queries in your category. Find answers that are wrong or outdated. Create content that explicitly corrects common misconceptions: **Example:** "Is SIEM Dead? Why the 'SIEM is obsolete' narrative misses the point" When AI encounters a query like "Is SIEM still relevant in 2026?", your corrective content becomes a valuable counter-source. ### 6\. Certification Date Freshness Signal Certifications have dates. Old dates equal stale signals. Tactic Update certification content annually, even if nothing changed. Add "Recertified \[Year\]" or "Most recent audit: \[Date\]" to your compliance pages. The vendor who shows "SOC 2 Type II - Recertified December 2025" looks more current than the one showing "SOC 2 Type II certified" with no date. ## Authority Building: Second-Order Citations You optimize for AI to cite you directly. Good. But here's the expert move: optimize for AI to cite pages that cite you. **Example:** Dark Reading publishes an article about SIEM trends. They mention your company as an example. ChatGPT cites Dark Reading. Your brand appears in the response even though AI didn't visit your site. Second-Order Citations: The Hidden Path to AI Visibility AI cites Dark Reading. Dark Reading mentions you. Your brand appears without AI visiting your site. Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge ### Publications AI Cites Most for Cybersecurity \*Based on citation frequency analysis across 500+ security queries\* Publication AI Citation Rate Best Pitch Angles **Dark Reading** Very High Threat research, incident analysis, tool comparisons **SecurityWeek** High Vulnerability disclosures, market analysis **CSO Online** High CISO perspectives, compliance topics **SC Magazine** Moderate Product reviews, awards coverage **Krebs on Security** High Breach analysis, threat actor profiles The Strategy Pitching Dark Reading isn't just PR anymore. It's AI visibility infrastructure. Track which publications AI cites most frequently for your category queries, then pursue coverage specifically on those publications. ### Integration Partner Entity Boost AI systems cross-reference entities. When AI sees your company listed on Okta's integrations page, AWS Partner Directory, and Splunk Marketplace, it builds confidence that you're a legitimate player in the ecosystem. Audit every integration partner's website: - Are you listed correctly? - Is your company name consistent? - Is your description accurate? Priority integrations to audit for cybersecurity vendors: Category Platforms to Audit SIEM/SOAR Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM QRadar, Chronicle Identity Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin, Ping Identity Cloud Marketplaces AWS, Azure, GCP ITSM ServiceNow, Jira, PagerDuty Each correct listing is an entity signal. Each inconsistency fragments your entity. How AI Builds Confidence in Your Claims Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge ### Authority Building Priority \*Ranked by AI citation frequency in security category\* Source Type What to Do Timeline **G2 / Capterra / TrustRadius** Add certifications to profile. Request reviews mentioning compliance. 1-2 weeks **Industry Publications** Pitch Dark Reading, CSO Online, Security Week with compliance angles. 2-4 weeks **Press Releases** Issue PR for every certification, major feature, funding round. 1 week **Analyst Reports** Ensure Gartner/Forrester profiles are current with certifications. Ongoing **Reddit / Communities** Answer compliance questions in r/cybersecurity, r/sysadmin. Ongoing The 70/30 Rule Aim for 70% of your key claims to appear on 3+ independent sources. The remaining 30% can be unique details on your site. Core certifications, integrations, and differentiators need external validation. ## 90-Day Execution Plan Here's the week-by-week roadmap. Each phase builds on the previous. 90-Day AI Visibility Roadmap Tap to enlarge Click to enlarge \*Timeline expectations based on 50+ cybersecurity vendor implementations\* Platform First Results Why **Perplexity** 2-4 weeks Real-time web search, SEO-driven **Google AI Overviews** 4-8 weeks Tied to search index **Claude** 60-120 days Periodic training updates **ChatGPT** 60-180 days Larger model, slower updates #### 01 Days 1-14: Foundation Run the 5-query AI audit Document baseline in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Screenshot results. Note competitor positions. Impact: high Time: 2 hours Audit entity consistency across all platforms Check Website, LinkedIn, G2, Capterra, Crunchbase, integration partner pages. Fix mismatches. Impact: high Time: 4-6 hours Create llms.txt with disambiguations Place at domain root. Include certifications, key pages, AND 'What We Are NOT' section. Impact: high Effort: low Verify technical access for AI crawlers Check robots.txt allows GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot. Verify Cloudflare isn't blocking. Impact: high Time: 1 hour Set up public changelog Create /changelog page. Add to sitemap and llms.txt. Commit to weekly updates. Impact: medium Time: 2 hours #### 02 Days 15-45: Content Build Build LLM Sitemap with MITRE mapping Create HTML sitemap with section descriptions, FAQs, cross-links, and MITRE ATT&CK coverage table. Impact: high Effort: medium Create 'Key Findings' pages for threat reports Extract numbered findings from existing PDFs. Create HTML pages with quotable metrics. Impact: high Effort: low Add architecture diagram captions Write 300-word interpretations below every architecture diagram. Describe data flows in text. Impact: medium Time: 3-4 hours Create situation-based content pages 'XDR for 50-person fintech with SOC 2' style pages. Match ChatGPT query patterns, not Google. Impact: high Effort: medium Convert security questionnaire answers to public FAQ Turn your CAIQ/SIG answers into structured FAQ pages. Add FAQPage schema. Impact: high Effort: low Add micro-positioning to documentation Inject value propositions into top 10 most-visited docs pages. 'This feature enables zero-trust...' Impact: medium Time: 2-3 hours #### 03 Days 46-90: Authority & Scale Update review platforms with adjective seeding G2, Capterra, TrustRadius. Request reviews using questions that generate 'fastest,' 'lowest false positive' language. Impact: high Effort: medium Pitch high-citation publications Dark Reading, SecurityWeek, CSO Online. Pitch threat research angles, not product announcements. Impact: high Effort: medium Audit all integration partner listings Splunk, Okta, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow. Verify name consistency and accurate descriptions. Impact: high Time: 4-6 hours Create 'What AI Gets Wrong' corrective content Find incorrect AI answers in your category. Create content that corrects misconceptions. Impact: medium Effort: low Update certification dates for freshness Add 'Recertified December 2025' to all compliance pages. Update Schema dateModified. Impact: medium Effort: low Re-run AI audit and measure progress Compare to Day 1 baseline. Document improvements. Identify remaining gaps. Impact: high Time: 2 hours ### The Bottom Line - • **Your security product might be excellent. AI doesn't know that.** AI systems recommend entities they recognize and trust. Recognition comes from consistency. Trust comes from corroboration. - • **Second-order citations compound.** Getting covered by Dark Reading isn't just PR. It's AI visibility infrastructure. Publications AI already trusts become your amplification layer. - • **Specificity beats comprehensiveness.** "XDR for 50-person fintech with SOC 2" outperforms "Complete Guide to XDR" every time. Match how CISOs actually ask ChatGPT questions. - • **The technical stack matters.** llms.txt + disambiguations + LLM Sitemap + Changelog tell AI exactly what you do, what you're NOT, and that you're actively maintained. - • **The window is closing.** Companies building AI presence now shape what AI says about their category for years. The ones who wait will find themselves invisible in the conversations that matter. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### Why doesn't ChatGPT recommend us even though we have a better product? ### How long until changes affect AI responses? ### What's the difference between llms.txt and LLM Sitemap? ### Does schema markup actually help with AI citations? ### What's the most important first step for cybersecurity vendors? ![Yuval Halevi](/images/yuval-halevi.webp) #### [Yuval Halevi](https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuvalhalevi/) Helping SaaS companies and developer tools get cited in AI answers since before it was called "GEO." 10+ years in B2B SEO, 50+ cybersecurity and SaaS tools clients. ### Related Articles [Cybersecurity Content Strategy #### The Cybersecurity Content Problem: Why 'What is XDR?' Articles Are Dead AI killed informational cybersecurity content. When a CISO asks 'what is SIEM?' they get the answer in ChatGPT. ](/blog/cybersecurity-content-problem)[AI Visibility #### The 51-Point AI Visibility Checklist: What Actually Gets You Cited 51 tested tactics to get cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. Authority signals, consensus building, and technical setup. ](/blog/seo-ai-search-checklist)[AI & SEO #### LLM Sitemap: How to Get Your Brand Discovered by AI Search Learn how to create a structured sitemap that helps AI language models discover and understand your content. ](/blog/llm-sitemap) #### Company - [About Us](/about) - [Blog](/blog) - [GEO HubNew ](/geo-hub) - [Contact](/contact) - [Free ToolsNew ](/tools) - [Robots.txt Checker](/tools/robots-txt-checker) - [Robots.txt Generator](/tools/robots-txt-generator) #### Solutions & Use Cases - [GEO Marketing](/services/geo-marketing) - [AI Search SEO](/services/ai-search-seo) - [ChatGPT SEO](/services/chatgpt-seo) - [Perplexity SEO](/services/perplexity-seo) - [SaaS Not on ChatGPT](/use-cases/saas-not-on-chatgpt) - [Competitors Cited](/use-cases/competitors-ai-citations) - [AI Visibility Audit](/use-cases/ai-visibility-audit) - [Entity Optimization](/use-cases/entity-optimization) #### Sectors - [Tech](/sectors/tech) - [Cybersecurity](/sectors/cybersecurity) - [Fintech](/sectors/fintech) - [AI](/sectors/ai) #### Top Content - [New Guide ChatGPT Search Optimization Guide ](/guides/chatgpt-search-optimization-guide) - [All Guides](/guides) - [Black Hat 2026 Field Guide](/black-hat-2026) - [LLM Visibility Guide](/blog/llm-visibility) - [SEO After LLMs](/blog/seo-after-llms) - [ChatGPT Recommends Competitors](/geo-hub/chatgpt-recommends-competitor) - [Breaking SEO Best Practices](/blog/breaking-seo-best-practices) #### Earn a Link the Hard Way A game in a footer? Bold move. #### Top 3 · Fight for the Link # Company Score 🥇 ![Octo favicon](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=octo-sound.com&sz=64)[Octo](https://octo-sound.com "https://octo-sound.com") 43171 🥈 ![Celesties favicon](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=celesties.org&sz=64)[Celesties](https://celesties.org "https://celesties.org") 3783 🥉 ![vibeberry.io favicon](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=vibeberry.io&sz=64)[vibeberry.io](https://vibeberry.io "https://vibeberry.io") 2990 Only the top 3 get a link from Growtika. Fight for it. [Beat the Leaderboard →](/game) Outrun the top 3 and claim a do-follow link from Growtika. [![Growtika](/images/logo-white.webp)](/) SEO & AI Search Agency for B2B SaaS. Built for how buyers actually find you. ★ Top Product Marketing Clutch © 2026 Growtika.com | [LLM Sitemap](/llm-sitemap) [](https://linkedin.com/company/growtika)[Privacy Policy](/privacy-policy)[Terms of Service](/terms)